Another downside to the economic slump ...

... hospitals cutting back on nosocomial (hospital acquired) infection control.

But infection-control professionals say their ranks are being thinned and they are losing the resources they need to fight infections as part of cutbacks linked to the economic downturn.

In a survey released today, the Association for Professionals in Infection Control says that 41% of nearly 2,000 respondents reported cuts in their budgets, including money for technology, staff, education, products and equipment. Of those, nearly 40% had layoffs or reduced hours, and a third experienced hiring freezes. Nurses who staff many of the departments say they are being asked to take on extra duties that distract them from infection control.

I've always maintained that if you MUST stay in a hospital, stay for as short a period of time as you can. I think nowadays this is even more prudent advice to follow. Because honestly? The hospitals don't seem to care.

Another concern that surfaced in the survey: only one in five respondents said their hospitals are using data-mining programs –- electronic surveillance systems that identify clusters of infections in real time so hospital staffers can intervene quickly.

Hospitals are not about making sick people well, it's about making money. Of course they do that by making most sick people well, but don't think for a minute that you're more than just a number ... with a dollar sign appended to the front of that number ... to them. If you die, the insurance still pays out. Sure killing people isn't good for business, but a measure of people are expected to die in hospitals, so unless something really egregious* happens, your death via nosocomial infection won't matter much.

*I'd be willing to bet that it'd take dozens or more people dying from the same nosocomial outbreak to garner significant attention to cause the hospital to worry about its reputation, and subsequently it's ability to turn a hefty profit.

Get off it ...

Read this article on MSNBC and had to laugh. They just don't get it.

The frugality of ... millions of other Americans who still have their good jobs feed back on the economy, holding down growth and encouraging other worried workers to trim their spending — causing the whole vicious cycle to run another lap.

Oh, so because I'm not in the currently dire situation of losing my job I'm causing the economy to stay tanked because I don't spend my money like a fiend? Piss off. Who knows how long any of us have at any job really. Of course I have a bit more to worry about than the average individual since I'm coming up for tenure soon.

Economists say many still-flush consumers are handcuffed by psychological traps that cause them to tighten their purse strings even though economic hardship is not their reality.

Sorry, it's not a trap, it's what I call "common sense" and "living within your means". A lot of people thought they had nothing to fear prior to this whole collapse, and look at them. Things take unexpected turns. I'd hardly call it a trap to think that an unexpected turn can happen to me even though I haven't been hit yet. So, I cut down a bit more here and there. It's not that I've ever really been free with my wallet ... except when I first got out of college and wasted money on a 3DO system (what a friggin mess that was). I shop for clothes at Old Navy and Kohl's, not Abercrombie. I don't buy brand name food. I mean, I doubt the chicken I can buy from Wal-Mart is worse off than buying Purdue. And I avoid fads ... which is why I still don't have a Wii or PS3 (though I'm dying for one). So, now that I'm smart with money ... you know, I actually liked buying shares in my IRA at this reduced price ... I'm to blame for the economy staying in the doldrums?

Whatever.